Sunday, October 21, 2018

The ground was broken March 3, 2014 and 922 days later the public open house happened. Just over 28 months and the empty gravel lot became one of the City’s biggest capital projects. Love the arena or hate it, that’s your choice, but you can’t deny the $2 Billion of construction that has started adjacent to this project is a significant boost to the downtown. Will the development have occurred without an arena? That’s hard to say. Changing demographics, the traditional work environment is evolving, the need to densify, all factors that suggest a renewed interest in our downtown will happen, the arena is just a catalyst. If this will really pan out, who knows, but that logic can be applied to anything we build, there’s always risk. There is a segment of the our population that use this type of facility, just like a recreation centre or library or performing arts centre. Taxpayers pay, some people use it some don’t. I’m not sure why there’s so much negativity, I guess there will always be a core group of outspoken citizens struggling with change. In the end we don’t know 100% that this project will fail to renew the downtown and do what it claimed it would but we also don’t know it won’t. We’ve spend decades sitting around. The do nothing group has had their time to prove to us that this has been the best course of action; and they’ve failed to deliver. It’s time to give the change advocates, the big idea people, a chance now. In 30 years if this hasn’t worked we can point fingers then.

The impact on homeless is a more interesting one. Is it really fair to expect a series of capital projects to solve social issues? The reality is that great strides have been taken to take 1,000’s of people off the streets already, and yet all levels of government struggle with this issue. ANY development in the downtown has the potential to disrupt the homeless, but we aren’t asking them to fix the problem. What will the City do when the Stanley Milner Library is closed for an extensive period for renovation? This will have a significant impact on our inner city population. Social issues are complex and societies problem to deal with and fix. They shouldn’t be taken lightly but at the same time don’t deflect the responsibility to a development project with limited ability to create any kind of meaningful change; that’s all of our responsibilities.

The facility is just an arena, it’ll create civic pride for some, it’ll create jobs for others, it’ll be an issue for some. There will be complaints about cost, access, operations, treaty land, etc. but at the end of the day those same complaints are levied against all civic facilities at some point; libraries, art galleries, performing arts, community buildings, even schools. We’re now a small big city, let’s start acting like one.

So if you want to read about my thoughts on the actual building, the rest is for you. If you don’t or you just want to bitch about hot dog prices then google something else and keep walking.

First off, hat’s off the City of Edmonton staff and Rogers Place staff for doing a great job. If you could follow directions, things went smoothly. Remember just because someone didn’t do it the way you would have, doesn’t make it wrong. There were lots of volunteers on the street directing people, lot’s of staff in the building, lots of police, if you didn’t know about parking, access, and other issues then that was your problem. Food prices I won’t even touch. It’s an event space, expect high prices. Why are people surprised about this??

The Ford Hall is a great space. My only complaint on opening day was the lack of benches and trash cans but I’m assuming they’re coming.

The Iron Foot Place mural by Alex Janvier is amazing and worth the visit on it’s own.

tjmx4671-160910_lr_screen
tjmx4638-160910_lr_screen

The second most talked about feature, the scoreboard also didn’t disappoint. It was amazing.

wp_20160910_09_48_53_pro_li-160910_lr_screen

Even from the top row the scoreboard looks great.
tjmx4668-160910_lr_screen

One of the more striking features is the amount of glass. The windows are great addition to the design.
wp_20160910_09_58_04_pro_li-160910_lr_screen_2

The Curve restaurant on the Loge level also looks like a great space and idea. Let’s hope it’s relatively easy to get in!! You can see people in the photo, the lower balcony area, looking down from the restaurant. The people at the highest balcony area are in the concession area for the upper sections.
tjmx4634-160910_lr_screen

It was unfortunate we couldn’t access the seats, I understand why, but at the same time it would have been great. With all the talk about how the organizers visited multiple venues and stole the best ideas, it’s clear when you visit that they did a great job.
wp_20160910_09_16_17_panorama-160910_lr_screen

Cranes will be around the site for a few more months!
tjmx4636-160910_lr_screen

OilersNation (click link) had a great article on the 37th Anniversary of the Oilers joining the NHL through the WHA merger. Click the Edmonton Journal link to read the original article. You’ll need to pan around Edmonton Journal (click link)

I can remember losing the coin toss with my sister and she got to go with my Dad to the first home game. Oilers vs Detroit. October 13, 1979. I was 16 at the time, I’ve been fortunate enough to see some great games, but I’m still disappointed I wasn’t at the first.

June 13 1979


There was another article on Vancouver going after the 1988 Winter Olympics. The advantage they had was that Calgary had no NHL size arena and Vancouver had the Pacific Coliseum. They also said that Edmonton hosted the Commonwealth games, a larger event than the Winter Olympics, and made a $400,000 profit. Vancouver felt they should be able to make a profit on the Olympics if the larger Commonwealth games could make a profit. Vancouver had assigned a budget of $70 million for the 1988 Olympics. Read the article here.

What was interesting was that the 2010 Olympics cost significantly more.  22 years later and an increase of 26x. It definitely illustrates the skyrocketing costs of the Olympics.

In 2004, the operational cost of the 2010 Winter Olympics was estimated to be Canadian $1.354 billion (about £828,499,787, 975,033,598 or US$1,314,307,896). As of mid-2009 it was projected to be C$1.76 billion,[13] mostly raised from non-government sources,[13] primarily through sponsorships and the auction of national broadcasting rights. C$580 million was the taxpayer-supported budget to construct or renovate venues throughout Vancouver and Whistler. A final audit conducted by PricewaterhouseCoopers released in December 2010 revealed total operation cost to have been $1.84 billion and came in on budget resulting in neither surplus nor deficit. Construction of venues also came on budget with a total cost of $603 million.[14]

PricewaterhouseCoopers’ study estimated a total contribution to the BC economy of $2.3 billion of Gross Domestic Product, and as well creating 45,000 jobs and contributing an additional $463 million to the tourism industry while venue construction by VANOC and 3rd parties added $1.22 billion to the economy, far short of the $10 billion forecast by Premier Gordon Campbell. The study also said that hosting the Olympics was one of many reasons why the provincial debt grew by $24 billion during the decade. In 2011, the provincial auditor-general declined to conduct a post-Games audit

Source – Wikipedia.